Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warningsīy combining the Three Black Waltzes consciousness in one, Kuja creates a Fourth Waltz and sends him after Zidane.Choose Not To Use Archive Warnings, No Archive Warnings Apply.Language: English Words: 57,417 Chapters: 14/? Comments: 3 Kudos: 6 Hits: 632 Garnet Til Alexandros XVII/Zidane Tribalįinal Fantasy IX: “The best Final Fantasy ever!” or an overrated and overhyped game with a poorly done love story? This play by commentary will show.
Marinos has other concerns he thinks are relevant, which you can find at the article. I cannot remember why I made this mistake, but I assume I saw someone else say something about this and didn’t dig deep enough to be fair to him. Second, although I said Cadegiani was “involved in a scandal” where the Brazilian government made a defective app, his only “involvement” was that the app used data he produced he was not responsible for its scandalous defects.
A new source that hadn’t been published at the time I wrote the piece time explains that the “crimes against humanity” accusation is because he didn’t stop a trial when it showed the experimental drug was much more effective than the placebo drug (which is a nonsensical accusation, since the accusers don’t believe this is true anyway), although it also describes other aspects of the trial as “an ethical cesspool”. I consider two of them relevant and problematic, have edited them out of the piece, and have added them to my Mistakes page like so:įirst, I noted that he was accused of poorly-fleshed-out “crimes against humanity” by the Brazilian government, and speculated that they might think he was killing his patients (although I said I personally thought this was false). Still, this is probably a sign that I should stop, which I will do immediately.Ĥ: Speaking of me being bad, Alexandros Marinos has another article on my ivermectin piece, this one relating to the work of Dr.
He is the person I am having this discussion with right now partly because he tweeted about me 23 times in the past six days and I figured it was worth responding to him in some way. I am focusing on him because he is the person I am having this discussion with right now. He also accuses me of unfairly focusing on him, rather than the many other people who agree with him.
He also gives probability estimates for some of the same statements I did - he thinks there’s only a 10% chance we can get full AGI without any paradigm shift (compared to my 40%), and only a 20% chance we can get it without something symbol-manipulation-y in particular (compared to my 66%). I agree that outside of math it’s generally not worth talking about “proving” things and I was using it colloquially as “provides such strong evidence that someone asserts it is true without any caveats or qualifiers” I usually think this usage is fine but have edited it in this case since he feels misrepresented. He is unhappy that I described him as thinking GPT’s performance “proves” its paradigm is doomed, whereas he only thinks it provides “evidence” for this. But I will grudgingly tolerate Crimson Wool’s comment, which links a poll that “asks a bunch of questions which seem to be fairly close to "‘how dumb and goddamn crazy are you?’"ģ: Gary Marcus has responded to Somewhat Contra Marcus On AI Scaling on his own Substack: Does AI Really Need A Paradigm Shift. I’ve edited the graph to include a link to the comment in the caption, but am stopping short of removing it or listing it as a Mistake for now.Ģ: Your comments on Which Party Has Gotten More Extreme were mostly terrible, and as promised I deleted all comments of the form “How can you even ask that question when the other party has done X, which is far crazier than anything my party has done?” - for the record, two of those comments were by Democrats and two by Republicans. 1: Correction: the graph on “ Against ‘There Are Two X-Wing Parties ’” was weird, see this comment for why.